Türkiye deepens Horn of Africa strategy as Red Sea crisis raises regional stakes
The rapidly deteriorating security situation in the Red Sea is reshaping strategic calculations across the Middle East and the Horn of Africa, placing Türkiye at the center of an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape. Following heightened instability in the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea has emerged as one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints, with new threats to commercial shipping, energy transportation, and regional security drawing the attention of major global and regional powers.
The latest escalation came after Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi movement announced what it described as a complete naval blockade targeting Saudi Arabia and intensified missile and drone attacks against Saudi oil tankers. The declaration has raised concerns about the safety of one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes, through which a significant share of global commerce and energy exports passes.
For Türkiye, the crisis represents more than a regional security challenge. It directly affects the country’s economic interests, maritime trade, and long-term geopolitical ambitions. Ankara has responded by strengthening its presence in the Horn of Africa while reaffirming its support for Saudi Arabia against threats to freedom of navigation and regional stability.
Türkiye strongly condemned the Houthi declaration of a naval blockade, expressing solidarity with Riyadh and emphasizing the importance of maintaining secure international shipping lanes. Turkish officials view uninterrupted maritime trade through the Red Sea and the Bab Al-Mandab Strait as essential not only for regional stability but also for the country’s own economic prosperity.
The timing of Türkiye’s latest military decisions underscores the growing importance it places on the region. The Turkish parliament recently approved a two-year extension of the country’s military mission in Somalia. Although the deployment itself is not new, the extension comes at a particularly significant moment, when mounting instability in the Red Sea is increasing the strategic value of the Horn of Africa.
For years, Ankara has steadily expanded its diplomatic, military, and economic engagement across Africa. Somalia has become the centerpiece of that strategy, serving as both a security partner and a gateway to broader Turkish influence along the eastern African coastline. The worsening security environment in the Red Sea has only strengthened Ankara’s determination to maintain a robust presence in the region.
The economic consequences of the maritime crisis are already being felt. Repeated attacks on commercial vessels have forced many international shipping companies to reroute cargo around the Cape of Good Hope instead of using the shorter Red Sea route. These diversions significantly increase shipping times, fuel consumption, insurance premiums, and transportation costs.
Türkiye, whose economy depends heavily on international trade with Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, has experienced rising freight costs as a result of these disruptions. The prolonged instability threatens supply chains, raises import and export expenses, and creates additional inflationary pressure on businesses dependent on maritime transportation.
The strategic importance of the Bab Al-Mandab Strait cannot be overstated. Located between Yemen and the Horn of Africa, the narrow waterway connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean. Any disruption to maritime traffic through this corridor has global implications, affecting energy markets, commercial shipping, and international supply chains.
For Ankara, protecting these sea lanes has become an increasingly important component of national economic planning and foreign policy. Turkish policymakers recognize that a sustained security crisis could undermine the country’s commercial interests while limiting access to critical markets.
At the same time, competition among regional and international powers has intensified. Countries including Israel, Gulf states, Iran, the United States, China, Russia, and several European nations all maintain varying degrees of strategic interest in the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa. Türkiye’s expanding engagement reflects its desire to secure a meaningful role in this increasingly competitive environment.
Ankara has steadily increased its military footprint in Somalia over recent years. In late January, Türkiye deployed F-16 fighter aircraft along with additional military personnel to reinforce its military base in Mogadishu. The deployment marked the first time advanced Turkish combat aircraft had been stationed in Somalia, signaling a significant expansion of Ankara’s security commitments in East Africa.
The move demonstrated that Türkiye views Somalia as more than a bilateral security partner. Instead, it represents a long-term strategic investment in safeguarding access to one of the world’s most important maritime corridors while strengthening Turkish influence across the wider region.
Türkiye’s expanding defense industry has further supported these ambitions. Ankara increasingly markets itself as a flexible security partner capable of cooperating with both NATO allies and regional governments. Turkish defense exports, including unmanned aerial vehicles, armored vehicles, naval systems, and advanced surveillance technologies, have become important instruments of foreign policy.
Military cooperation often accompanies broader political and economic engagement, allowing Türkiye to strengthen partnerships while promoting indigenous defense capabilities abroad.
The country’s economic ambitions also extend beneath the sea. In February, Türkiye dispatched a deep-sea drilling vessel to Somalia for what officials described as its first offshore energy exploration mission conducted outside Turkish maritime jurisdiction. Although the exploration occurred in the Indian Ocean, it remained closely connected to the broader Red Sea security environment.
Given the persistent threat posed by attacks on commercial and research vessels, Türkiye provided naval escorts to protect its survey and drilling operations. The mission highlighted Ankara’s willingness to combine military capabilities with economic initiatives in pursuit of long-term strategic objectives.
Türkiye’s broader regional strategy extends beyond Somalia alone. Ankara has shown interest in expanding influence over key ports and maritime infrastructure across the Horn of Africa and North Africa. Strategic locations including Mogadishu Port, Sudan’s Suakin Island, and ports in Libya have all figured prominently in Turkish regional planning.
These assets offer opportunities to strengthen commercial connectivity while supporting maritime logistics, naval operations, humanitarian assistance, and regional diplomacy.
Should security conditions continue to deteriorate in the southern Red Sea, Türkiye is expected to expand its role in protecting commercial shipping. Its military presence in Somalia could facilitate intelligence-sharing, maritime surveillance, anti-piracy operations, and coordination with regional partners aimed at preserving freedom of navigation.
Ankara is also likely to deepen security cooperation with Saudi Arabia. Areas of potential collaboration include intelligence exchange, joint defense-industrial projects, drone technologies, integrated air and missile defense systems, maritime domain awareness, and the protection of critical energy infrastructure.
Such cooperation reflects growing convergence between Turkish and Saudi interests despite periods of political disagreement in previous years. Both countries now share concerns regarding threats to regional trade, energy security, and maritime stability.
As a NATO member, Türkiye also shares the alliance’s broader interest in ensuring secure international sea lanes. Although NATO itself maintains only a limited operational role in the Red Sea, Ankara could contribute through intelligence cooperation, maritime surveillance, naval coordination, or selective participation in multinational security initiatives should regional conditions require.
Nevertheless, Turkish policymakers appear determined to avoid becoming directly involved in a broader regional conflict unless national interests are directly threatened.
That cautious approach has precedent. In 2024, Houthi forces targeted a Turkish commercial vessel using ballistic and naval missiles. Türkiye strongly condemned the attack and stated that appropriate measures had been taken to prevent similar incidents, although officials declined to disclose specific operational details.
Following those attacks, a US-led coalition supported by Britain launched airstrikes against Houthi military positions. Despite being a NATO ally and having one of its own vessels targeted, Türkiye chose not to participate directly in the Western military campaign.
Instead, Ankara maintained a carefully balanced policy that emphasized strategic autonomy while preserving communication with competing regional actors. This pragmatic approach enabled Türkiye to protect its interests without becoming fully aligned with any single military bloc.
However, today’s strategic environment differs significantly from that of 2024. The Red Sea has evolved from a secondary foreign policy concern into a central arena where maritime security, regional influence, energy interests, defense cooperation, and international trade increasingly converge.
As tensions continue to rise, Türkiye faces the challenge of protecting its expanding economic and geopolitical interests while preserving its reputation as an independent regional power capable of engaging multiple partners. Whether through enhanced military cooperation, stronger maritime security initiatives, or expanded diplomatic engagement, Ankara’s actions in the Horn of Africa are likely to play an increasingly important role in shaping the future security architecture of the Red Sea and its surrounding regions.
Suraiyya Aziz specializes on topics related to the Middle East and the Arab world.
